|
After purchasing an adapter it works fine with all of my computers. This is the best running GPS out there in my opinion because the screen is big enough to see, unlike the 405 / 305, which have slightly better reception, but very little visibility. The "Triumph" HR monitor that I already had worked with it as well. Unfortunately, this particular model that I purchased was not the USB model, but the serial connecting model (serial doesn't work with new computers without a USB adapter, of course). This is a mistake that can be easily made because there is no way to tell the difference unless you look at the back and see either 4 dots (serial), or a small trapezoid plug (USB) which is on the back on the newer 201 models. Overall: Excellent product. Complaint: Be careful that you buy the 201 with the right connector.
It's more general in nature. I like having this along with me while I run. The only thing that I miss in this model (as opposed to the 301)is that when you input your personal data it isn't as specific as the 301. Example, age, M/F,height.these are not available on the 201. Also, it takes a slight time longer to obtain the GPS signal.
the 305 can lock in 5-10 seconds most days while the 201 would lock in ~2 minutes *most* of the time but occasionally would take up to 5 minutes. If you can afford to the extra dough, here is why it's worth it.I bought the 201 when it first came out (~7 years ago) It was head and shoulders above the Timex product with the remote arm pod and I would have rated it 5 stars back then because it was the best of it's kind. The 305 can lock even if you're riding a bicycle. It is SOOOOO much better that I have to now rate the 201 as one star in comparison.
Interesting concept but not practical. The 205 is the same but without heart rate.First, the 101/201 have a very unusual shape. The 205/305 is a bulky watch but the looong 201 prevented you from wearing gloves - a real problem when skiing, cycling, etc.Second - and more importantly, the 205/305 have the SIRF Star III Chipset which means it can lock on and hold the lock better.Imagine if you will - you're all ready to run and pumped up - whoops, you now have to wait an extra few minutes to lock your position, otherwise it cannot tell you your speed, location, etc.My old 201 locked on far faster than my running partner's Timex (He had to hang it on a tree while he was getting ready since it often took 5 minutes or more to lock). The 205 is $30 more than the 201, but is ten times the watch. It's better in my opinion than the Polar products (of which I've owned three)I'd avoid the 405 unless you really want to use this watch as a normal day to day wristwatch (check out the 405 reviews)My only complaint is that it's easy to leave it on and run the battery down - which is a bummer if you're just about to work out. With the 305 I can even get a lock in my house most of the time.Finally, the 101/201 cannot lock IF YOU ARE MOVING.
I think I've even gotten a lock while driving.Yes the 205 and 305 cost more but with the huge difference in functionality I find it astonishing that Garmin would continue to sell the 201 given how much better the 205 and 305 are.p.s. Don't bother with the 405.
I wish there was an "auto off" feature which would shut it down if it detects no movement or heart rate within an hour or so. I even used it to go geocaching.The problem is, I have to strongly recommend against anyone buying it today - I was "lucky" to have lost this kayaking a couple of years ago at which point I upgraded to the 305.
Read the reviews.I use mine for cycling and running, the direct link to see your workouts mapped on GOOGLE EARTH is FANTASTIC. If you were ~100 miles away from your prior location, the 201 would take up to 10 minutes to get a new lock.
ARRRGGGGHH.Also the 201 would lose lock all the time when running in even moderate tree cover or heavy clouds. (the included software is far more stable than the junk Polar included with their HRM's.Heart rate strap with replaceable battery is coded and comfortable.
Fortunately, with Li-Ion batteries, as little as a 10 minute charge gives you enough juice for a 90 minute run.If you've found this review to be helpful, please let me know.
The charger itself is all too easy to use and has an adapter for 110-240v outlets, the plug can also be changed on the charger to fit a variety of outlet types. The Garmin Forerunner 201 has already improved running for me, not only do I know how far I have ran, I know how fast I have been running, and even have reference points for where I have been. The unit itself is lightweight, easy to use, waterproof, and has a rechargeable battery. The screen is farely large and the numbers are easy to read, the button layout is simple and if you just want it to time your run its a two button affair. All in all a very good buy it will improve your runs especially if you like to try new places.
I used it the whole time I was in Iraq just to see how I improved on my runs and how long they were. It works great without a flaw.
|